01
Application context & facts
- The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court developed an AI-assisted adjudication system and deployed a vertical model for judicial work.
- A publicly reported application case states that the system has assisted work on more than 600,000 cases.
- The project was listed among Guangdong's representative AI-plus application cases.
02
Core legal & governance issues
- How judicial data entering models and knowledge bases should be protected and access-controlled
- How generated suggestions, similar-case search, and drafting outputs should be source-verified and reviewed
- How models, prompts, knowledge bases, and logs can support judicial accountability and audit
03
Governance & implementation status
- The project provides a vertical model and case-handling support across judicial scenarios.
- Public materials describe it as a representative application of AI in legal and judicial work.
- Its detailed technical architecture, evaluation metrics, and governance rules remain subject to confirmation from future official materials.
04
Practical compliance guidance
01Judicial and legal systems should retain an assistive role and require authorized personnel to review facts, authorities, and final outputs.
02Case data used for training, retrieval, and generation requires classification, least-privilege access, and complete logs.
03Acceptance testing should cover accuracy, citation traceability, unauthorized access, bias, hallucination, and fallback procedures.