Data and role map
Identify sources, purposes, flows, storage and participant roles.
AI LEGAL SERVICE
Map data sources, processing roles, purposes, flows and controls across AI systems.
SERVICE OVERVIEW
AI creates new data paths across training, retrieval, interaction and improvement. We assess personal information, important data, trade secrets and third-party data against the actual system architecture.
REVIEW SCOPE
Identify sources, purposes, flows, storage and participant roles.
Assess legal basis, notice, consent, minimisation, retention and rights handling.
Review ingestion, access, retrieval, citation, update and deletion controls.
Review model, cloud, data and annotation vendors and contract allocation.
Identify transfer paths and prepare the applicable assessment and records.
Address misuse, leakage, excessive retrieval and abnormal output.
DELIVERABLES
STARTER MATERIALS
WORKFLOW
Confirm business objectives, system boundaries and review priorities.
Map data, models, people, permissions, contracts and system actions.
Review materials, interview key roles and test representative scenarios.
Prioritise controls, documents, product changes and responsible owners.
Review changes, record the version and set reassessment triggers.
FAQ
Yes. Internal uses may still involve personal information, trade secrets, client materials and third-party rights.
Key points include training use, retention, subprocessors, transfers, incidents, output responsibility and deletion on exit.
Yes. The scope can integrate impact assessment, transfer analysis, vendor review and policy updates.
Research
Consider the relevant cases and rules in the project’s target markets.
A credit agency automatically generated credit scores for use by third parties such as banks. The Court of Justice of the European Union held that when a score plays a decisive role in a third party's decision, the scoring activity constitutes automated individual decision-making governed by Article 22 of the GDPR.
Read case →Case study · ChinaAudio recordings were used to create an AI voice product capable of generating arbitrary text-to-speech voiceovers. The court held that voice rights protect AI-synthesized voices when the voice leads the public to associate it with a specific natural person.
Read case →Legal research · ChinaThe measures govern generative AI services offered to the public in China and address training data, generated content, personal information, security and complaint handling.
Read analysis →Legal research · European UnionThe AI Act uses a risk-based framework for prohibited practices, high-risk systems, general-purpose AI models and transparency duties, including rules that reach some providers outside the EU.
Read analysis →RELATED SERVICES
SPECIALIZED ENQUIRY
Share your product stage, system capabilities, data flows, and priority legal requirements. Our practice team will confirm the scope of engagement.